A team is divided into Camp A (supports the project) and Camp B (opposes). At least one Camp A member argued for cost savings. Which statement is most strongly supported?

• A. Camp B also supports the project.
• B. Camp A is in favor of proceeding with the project.
• C. Camp B has proposed delaying the project.
• D. Camp A has proposed a plan that reduces cost.

Answer: (B)

The main idea is that Camp A’s role is to support the project, while Camp B opposes. If at least one member of Camp A argued for cost savings, that shows Camp A is seeking efficiency within the framework of moving forward, not abandoning the project. That makes the statement that Camp A is in favor of proceeding with the project the most directly supported conclusion, because the cost-saving argument is a way to make the project better or more acceptable while still backing it.

Why the other statements fit less well: it isn’t indicated that Camp B also supports the project, or that Camp B proposed delaying it. The fact that a Camp A member talked about reducing costs doesn’t necessarily mean Camp A itself proposed a formal plan; it could be an argument within their support. The strongest, most direct takeaway from the given information is that Camp A remains in favor of proceeding.