Which of the following is a credible tactic to paraphrase the conclusion without quoting it directly?

Study for the Logical Reasoning STEM Test. Practice with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Prepare for success!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is a credible tactic to paraphrase the conclusion without quoting it directly?

Paraphrasing the conclusion means restating the final claim in your own words while keeping the same meaning. This shows you’ve understood exactly what the argument is asserting without repeating the exact wording. The best choice demonstrates this preserved meaning in new language, rather than quoting or altering the claim. For example, if the conclusion is that “the policy should be adopted,” a paraphrase would be “thus, adopting the policy is warranted.” The meaning stays the same, just expressed differently. The other options miss the mark because they either treat premises as if they were the conclusion, describe a completely different implication, or use the conclusion to challenge the premises instead of simply restating the conclusion in your own terms.

Paraphrasing the conclusion means restating the final claim in your own words while keeping the same meaning. This shows you’ve understood exactly what the argument is asserting without repeating the exact wording. The best choice demonstrates this preserved meaning in new language, rather than quoting or altering the claim.

For example, if the conclusion is that “the policy should be adopted,” a paraphrase would be “thus, adopting the policy is warranted.” The meaning stays the same, just expressed differently.

The other options miss the mark because they either treat premises as if they were the conclusion, describe a completely different implication, or use the conclusion to challenge the premises instead of simply restating the conclusion in your own terms.

More practice questions